String Theory Explained – What is The True Nature of Reality?

String Theory Explained – What is The True Nature of Reality?

What is the true nature of the universe? To answer this question, humans come up with stories to describe the world. We test our stories and learn what to keep and what to throw away. But the more we learn, the more complicated and weird our stories become. Some of them so much so, that it’s really hard to know what they’re actually about. Like string theory. A famous, controversial and often misunderstood story, about the nature of everything. Why did we come up with it and is it correct? Or just an idea we should chuck out? To understand the true nature of reality, we looked at things up close and were amazed. Wonderous landscapes in the dust, zoos of bizarre creatures, complex protein robots. All of them made from structures of molecules made up of countless even smaller things: Atoms. We thought they were the final layer of reality, until we smashed them together really hard and discovered things that can’t be divided anymore: Elementary particles. But now, we had a problem: They are so small that we could no longer look at them. Think about it: what is seeing? To see something, we need light, an electromagnetic wave. This wave hits the surface of the thing and gets reflected back from it into your eye. The wave carries information from the object that your brain uses to create an image. So you can’t see something without somehow interacting with it. Seeing is touching, an active process, not a passive one. This is not a problem with most things. But particles are But particles are very, But particles are very, very, But particles are very, very, very small. So small that the electromagnetic waves we used to see are too big to touch them. Visible light just passes over them. We can try to solve this by creating electromagnetic waves with more and much smaller wavelengths. But more wavelengths, means more energy. So, when we touch a particle with a wave that has a lot of energy it alters it. By looking at a particle, we change it. So, we can’t measure elementary particles precisely. This fact is so important that it has a name: The Heisenberg uncertainty principle. The basis of all quantum physics. So, what does a particle look like then? What is its nature? We don’t know. If we look really hard, we can see a blurry sphere of influence, but not the particles themselves. We just know they exist. But if that’s the case, how can we do any science with them? We did what humans do and invented a new story: A mathematical fiction. The story of the point particle. We decided that we would pretend that a particle is a point in space. Any electron is a point with a certain electric charge and a certain mass. All indistinguishable from each other. This way physicists could define them and calculate all of their interactions. This is called Quantum Field Theory, and solved a lot of problems. All of the standard model of particle physics is built on it and it predicts lots of things very well. Some quantum properties of the electron for example have been tested and are accurate up to 0, 0,00 0,0000 0,000000 0,00000000 0,0000000000 0,000000000000 0,0000000000002 %. So, while particles are not really points, by treating them as if they were, we get a pretty good picture of the universe. Not only did this idea advance science, it also led to a lot of real-world technology we use everyday. But there’s a huge problem: Gravity. In quantum mechanics, all physical forces are carried by certain particles. But according to Einstein’s general relativity, gravity is not a force like the others in the universe. If the universe is a play, particles are the actors, but gravity is the stage. To put it simply, gravity is a theory of geometry. The geometry of space-time itself. Of distances, which we need to describe with absolute precision. But since there is no way to precisely measure things in the quantum world, our story of gravity doesn’t work with our story of quantum physics. When physicists tried to add gravity to the story by inventing a new particle, their mathematics broke down and this is a big problem. If we could marry gravity to quantum physics and the standard model, we would have the theory of everything. So, very smart people came up with a new story. They asked: What is more complex than a point? A line- A line or a string. String theory was born. What makes string theory so elegant, is that it describes many different elementary particles as different modes of vibration of the string. Just like a violin string vibrating differently can give you a lot of different notes, a string can give you different particles Most importantly, this includes gravity. String theory promised to unify all fundamental forces of the universe. This caused enormous excitement and hype. String theory quickly graduated to a possible theory of everything Unfortunately, string theory comes with a lot of strings attached. Much of the maths involving a consistent string theory does not work in our universe with its three spatial and one temporal dimensions. String theory requires ten dimensions to work out. So, string theorists did calculations in model universes. And then try to get rid of the six additional dimensions and describe our own universe But so far, nobody has succeeded and no prediction of string theory has been proven in an experiment So, string theory did not reveal the nature of our universe. One could argue that in this case string theory really isn’t useful at all. Science is all about experiments and predictions. If we can’t do those, why should we bother with strings? It really is all about how we use it. Physics is based on maths. Two plus two makes four. This is true no matter how you feel about it. And the maths in string theory does work out. That’s why string theory is still useful. Imagine that you want to build a cruise ship, but you only have blueprints for a small rowing boat. There are plenty of differences: the engine, the engine, the materials, the engine, the materials, the scale. But both things are fundamentally the same: Things that float. So, by studying the rowing boat blueprints, you might still learn something about how to build a cruise ship eventually. With string theory, we can try to answer some questions about quantum gravity that have been puzzling physicists for decades. Such as how black holes work or the information paradox. String theory may point us in the right direction. When used in this spirit, string theory becomes a precious tool for theoretical physicists and help them discover new aspects of the quantum world and some beautiful mathematics. So, maybe the story of string theory is not the theory of everything. But just like the story of the point particle, it may be an extremely useful story. We don’t yet know what the true nature of reality is but we’ll keep coming up with stories to try and find out. Until one day, Until one day, hopefully Until one day, hopefully, we do know. This video was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation and realized with the scientific advice of Alessandro Sfondrini.

100 thoughts on “String Theory Explained – What is The True Nature of Reality?

  1. The topic in this video was out of date long before you posted it. String theory has moved to M theory years ago. You can't talk about string theory without mentioning M theory.

  2. I really love your videos they are funny to watch so beautiful and brilliantly made I just love them so much ❤❤ please keep making them
    PS: I loved the Zelda Reference ❤❤❤

  3. 2:45 “We just know they exist.” without an explanation, reason, or other evidence, is religion. I’m not criticizing the theory, or saying there isn’t evidence. I’m pointing out what most people pass over as an “unimportant” detail, as a critique of a widespread, severe cultural problem simply exhibited in this moment, anything with the label “science” slapped on it is taken with zealous blind faith by masses who consider themselves wise after listening to it even though in almost everything most people call science these days there are tons of holes filled with faith via the appeal to authority tactic (shamelessly flaunted at 4:45) too many are sssooo susceptible to. Listen to everything, but question everything, and a true skeptic’s radar should go off anytime someone says “just is”, “it’s just a fact”, “it’s undebatable”, etc. Explanations are always owed in teaching. Oversimplifications are better than omissions. I’m not harshly criticizing the makers of this video. Just trying to point out this extremely common pattern to hopefully cause a few people to start thinking a bit more skeptically toward blind faith, regardless of whether it’s used by people calling it religion, politics, science, or anything else. A bunch of people believing the same thing blindly doesn’t make it more true than one person believing it. And the worshippers of anything labeled “science” always overlook the irony of things like 1:05 – 1:15 here. Even when acknowledging that past “knowledge” was false, science-worshippers fail to acknowledge that people can be wrong again. It’s always definitively said that we “can’t divide __ anymore. It’s the smallest thing in existence.” and then it gets divided, and more, and more, but each time people are just as arrogantly sure, “this is the smallest thing now. It’s a fact.” 🤦‍♂️ I know at least 99% of people on this channel will misconstrue what I’m saying and miss my points. Science is great when honest. This seems like a decent video. Just wish blind faith would stop being a constant necessity to complete every “scientific” explanation of anything on the internet and that people would stop totally accepting it with said blind faith without so much as a degree of reservation that maybe that current theories are just as capable of being wrong as all past ones. Wish people’d figure out that no, nobody knows everything and we never will. Keep trying, sure. But stay humble. Hope even 1 person sees my point. Don’t bother trying to start a fight. I’ve said what I needed to. Peace. Nice graphics & narration by the way 👍 well-presented info overall.

  4. I think i can simplify the universe: It used to be a supercompressed thing that has such absolute density which then collapsed and explodes with a big bang which creates the ever extending universe which soon will all die out then be the supercompressed thing and it repeats

  5. Theory of Everything is, Everything about us.

    Who born will be die then reborn.

    So, we've plenty of time to figure this out. Jus' like how we reached here.

  6. So, Heisenberg was not just a former high school chemistry teacher but also a theoretical physicist who came up with an important theory?

  7. 🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮💩🤮🤮HBO Is gatbage shit who have spam me on mail every singel day in 2018. I JATE HBO

  8. Maybe if as much money was spent on science than the military, and if people stopped taking useless majors instead of STEM, we could get to the answer much quicker.

  9. The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle is NOT the observer effect, although it is commonly confused as such (as shown in this video, unfortunately).

  10. When u observe something are u interacting with it tho? Wouldn’t photons just bounce of it anyways even if you weren’t observing?

  11. 6:28 is that math real ?
    While i was thinking about it, wouldnt it be cool if someone came up with a way something does NOT equal ? 2=3 for example

  12. maybe I don't get this right due to language, but, doesn't accurate up to 0.000000000002% actually mean not accurate at all? errors up to 0.00..2% means high accuracy

  13. Hello Graphic Artists….Don't use too many colors….it can't let you focus on one thing you want to see in these ver fast and cartoonish presentations…Thanks!!

  14. There are two heisenberg principles, one that is found in textbooks(that we can not measure because of instruments), and one that is the real one implying superposition(from the intrisic nature of reality) and has the formula.

  15. String theory is not a theory. It's not even a hypothesis, because it's not falsifiable. It cannot be proved or disproved, because it's low energy limit is quantum field theory. The mathematics in string theory is also horrendous. Its best bet was the AdS/CFT correspondence, but they can only arrive at results we already know. 99% of physicists see stringy stuff as a joke.

    Also, the Heisenberg's uncertainty principle is not fundamental in quantum mechanics. It's valid for all waves, and in QM we can derive it from the non-commutativity of observables in the Heisenberg's picture or from the Pontryagin duality between position and momentum in Schrödinger's picture. The uncertainty principle can also be violated.

    This video is quite misleading.

  16. Actually, I was thinking about the elemental particles that we're not supposed to see.
    I'm not a scinentist or anything, but I wonder what would hapen if we could force these particles to generate their own light, like, by heating them or something

  17. Ever think we are meer humans an not capable to understand it for a reason? We are so primitive, we seek war. We would probs bring a nuke to an interstellar plasma pulse ugh.

  18. As may be established empirically, matter is not essential so that existence may be made subject to it, and be dependent on it. Rather, matter subsists through a meaning, and that meaning is life, it is spirit.
    Also, as may be established through observation, matter is not the thing served so that everything may be ascribed to it. It is rather the servant; it renders service to the process of the perfection of a truth. And that truth is life. And the fundament of that truth is spirit.
    Also, as is self-evident, matter is not dominant so that recourse may be made to it or perfections sought from it. Rather, it is dominated; it looks to the decree of some fundament, it is in motion in the way that that decree dictates. And that fundament is life, it is spirit, it is consciousness.
    Also, as is necessary, matter is not the kernel, it is not the fundament, it is not a settled abode so that events and perfections may be affixed to it or constructed on it. Rather, it is a shell prepared to be split, rent, dissolved; it is a husk, it is froth, it is a form.
    Consider the following: a creature so minute it can only be seen with a microscope has such acute senses it can hear its friend's voice, and see its sustenance; it has extremely sensitive and sharp senses. This demonstrates that the effects of life increase and the light of the spirit intensifies in proportion to the reducing and refining of matter. It is as though the more matter is refined and the more we become distanced from our material existences, the closer we draw to the world of the spirit, the world of life, and the world of consciousness; and the more intensely the heat of the spirit and the light of life are manifested.
    Is it therefore at all possible that there should be this many distillations of life, consciousness, and spirit within this veil of materiality, and that the inner world which is beyond this veil should not be full of conscious beings and beings with spirits? Is it at all possible that the sources of these numberless distillations, flashes, and fruits of meaning, spirit, life and the truth apparent in this material existence in the Manifest World should be ascribed only to matter and the motion of matter, and be explained by it? God forbid! Absolutely not! These innumerable distillations and flashes demonstrate that this material and manifest world is but a lace veil strewn over the inner and spirit worlds.
    Risale-i Nur Collection Words – 526

  19. Fifth Principle:
    You will understand, too, that all of these transient objects have not been created for the sake of annihilation, in order to appear briefly and then vanish. The purpose for their creation is rather briefly to be assembled in existence and acquire the desired form, so that these may be noted, their images preserved, their meanings known, and their results recorded. This is so that, for example, everlasting spectacles might be wrought for the people of eternity, and that they might serve other purposes in the realm of eternity. You will understand that things have been created for eternity, not for annihilation; and as for apparent annihilation, it has the sense of a completion of duty and a release from service, for every transient thing advances to annihilation with one aspect, but remains eternally with numerous other aspects.
    Look, for example, at the flower, a word of God's power; for a short time it smiles and looks at us, and then hides behind the veil of annihilation. It departs just like a word leaving your mouth. But it does so entrusting thousands of its fellows to men's ears. It leaves behind meanings in men's minds as numerous as those minds. The flower, too, expressing its meaning and thus fulfilling its function, goes and departs. But it goes leaving its apparent form in the memory of everything that sees it, its inner essence in every seed. It is as if each memory and seed were a camera to record the adornment of the flower, or a means for its perpetuation. If such be the case with an object at the simplest level of life, it can be readily understood how closely tied to eternity is man, the highest form of life and the possessor of an eternal soul. Again, from the fact that the laws each resembling a spirit according to which large flowering and fruit bearing plants are formed and the representations of their forms are preserved and perpetuated in most regular fashion in tiny seeds throughout tempestuous changes – from this fact it can be easily understood how closely tied and related to eternity is the spirit of man, which possesses an extremely exalted and comprehensive nature, and which although clothed in a body, is a conscious and luminous law issuing from the divine command.
    Sixth Principle:
    You will also understand that man has not been left to graze at will, with a halter loosely tied around his neck; on the contrary, the forms of all his deeds are recorded and registered, and the results of all his acts are preserved for the day when he shall be called to account.
    Risale-i Nur Collection Words 86 – Bediüzzaman Said Nursi

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *